Vic Sotto Files ₱35M Cyberlibel Lawsuit Against Darryl Yap
MANILA, Philippines — Actor and television host Vic Sotto has filed a lawsuit against director Darryl Yap, seeking over ₱35 million in damages for alleged “malicious and defamatory statements.” The complaint was filed on January 9 at the Muntinlupa City Office of the City Prosecutor.
Sotto’s allegations stem from Yap’s recent film, which reportedly portrayed him as a rapist. The actor accuses Yap of using defamatory content as a marketing strategy for his film.
The Allegations Against Darryl Yap
In his complaint, Sotto claimed that Yap’s actions went beyond artistic expression and veered into character assassination. The actor cited several social media posts and promotional teasers for Yap’s film, which allegedly painted him in a negative light.
“The respondent is a clout chaser using his social media platforms to garner attention for his film. In his desire to earn more money, he openly accused me of being a rapist,” Sotto stated in his complaint.
Legal Action and Filed Charges
Sotto’s legal team filed 19 counts of cyberlibel against Yap, emphasizing that each defamatory post on Yap’s Facebook page constitutes a separate offense. Under the Cybercrime Prevention Act, cyberlibel is punishable by imprisonment of six to eight years and monetary damages.
The ₱35 million lawsuit includes ₱20 million in moral damages for mental anguish and social humiliation, and ₱15 million in exemplary damages to deter similar offenses in the future.
Statements from Vic Sotto and His Lawyer
Sotto expressed his frustration over the harm caused to his reputation, saying, “Due to the malicious and defamatory posts made by the respondent, I have been subjected to public ridicule and contempt.”
Lawyer Buko dela Cruz reiterated the gravity of the accusations: “Every defamatory post is one count of cyberlibel. This is not just about free speech; it’s about accountability.”
The Impact on Vic Sotto’s Reputation
Sotto’s complaint highlights the emotional toll of the allegations. The public ridicule and humiliation caused by the defamatory posts have affected his mental well-being and professional credibility.
This case underscores the importance of addressing online defamation, especially in an era where social media can amplify harm.
What Is a Writ of Habeas Data?
As part of his legal strategy, Sotto’s team also filed a writ of habeas data, which the court granted. This legal remedy directs Yap to cease posting teaser videos and promotional materials for the film.
The writ is designed to protect Sotto’s personal data and reputation, reinforcing the legal boundaries for content creators in the digital space.
Public Reaction to the Lawsuit
Social media users have expressed mixed reactions to the lawsuit. While some fans praised Sotto for standing up against defamation, others questioned the legal implications for freedom of speech in the creative industry.
The case has sparked broader discussions about the balance between artistic freedom and accountability.
Disclaimer
This article is based on publicly available information and legal documents. The content is intended for informational purposes only and does not aim to influence public opinion regarding the case. Readers are encouraged to respect the ongoing legal process and refrain from making prejudgments.
Gamescorewire neither endorses nor supports any opinions or actions depicted in this content.
