Director Darryl Yap has responded to the cyber libel case filed against him by actor-host Vic Sotto. The case involves 19 counts of cyber libel over alleged “malicious and defamatory statements” made in connection to Yap’s film, The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma.
Yap, known for his controversial works, issued a statement earlier today, emphasizing that he will address the charges after receiving the formal complaint.
The Cyber Libel Case Against Darryl Yap
Vic Sotto filed 19 counts of cyber libel against Yap on January 9, 2025, at the Muntinlupa City Office of the City Prosecutor. The actor alleged that Yap’s promotional materials and social media posts related to the film portrayed him as a rapist, damaging his reputation.
The case includes ₱35 million in damages, comprising ₱20 million in moral damages and ₱15 million in exemplary damages. A Writ of Habeas Data was also issued, prohibiting Yap from releasing any further promotional content related to the film.
Darryl Yap’s Initial Reaction
In his statement, Yap clarified that he has no hard feelings about the lawsuit. “Malaya naman po kahit na sino magsampa ng kaso,” he said, emphasizing that everyone has the right to take legal action.
He also defended the materials in his film, stating:
“Lahat po ng materyal na aking inilabas o ilalabas ay nakadokumento — hindi ko po gawa-gawa para makapanira. Wala pong personalan, naglalahad lamang po ako ng nangyari sa nakaraan na makikita sa mga nailathala noong 1980s.”
The Controversial Film and Its Context
Yap’s film, The Rapists of Pepsi Paloma, revisits a highly publicized scandal from the 1980s. Pepsi Paloma, a former actress, accused Vic Sotto, Joey de Leon, and the late Richie D’Horsie of rape. The case was eventually dropped, but it remains a controversial topic in Philippine pop culture history.
The film’s teaser reportedly highlighted these accusations, prompting Sotto’s legal team to file charges.
Legal Implications of the Case
Under the Cybercrime Prevention Act, cyber libel is punishable by imprisonment and monetary damages. Each defamatory post constitutes one count of cyber libel, according to Sotto’s legal counsel, Buko dela Cruz.
The Writ of Habeas Data, granted by the Muntinlupa Regional Trial Court, aims to protect Sotto’s personal data and reputation. It prohibits Yap and his team from distributing promotional content for the film.
Public Reaction to the Case
The case has sparked widespread discussion online.
- Some netizens support Sotto’s legal actions, arguing that freedom of expression has limits.
- Others defend Yap, highlighting the importance of artistic freedom and historical storytelling.
The debate underscores the fine line between creative expression and defamation in today’s digital landscape.
What Happens Next?
As the case unfolds, both parties are expected to present their arguments in court. Legal experts suggest that this case may set a precedent for future cyber libel and defamation cases in the Philippines.
It’s crucial for the public to respect the judicial process and avoid drawing premature conclusions.
Disclaimer
This article is based on publicly available information and official statements. It does not intend to influence public opinion or preempt legal outcomes. Readers are encouraged to approach the topic with fairness and respect for all parties involved.
Gamescorewire neither endorses nor supports any opinions or actions depicted in this content.
Related Topic: Vic Sotto, Sinampahan si Darryl Yap ng P30M Damages
